How the promoters of the GCSE manipulated input to avoid being accused of bias, and discriminations against other deaf people, and those with hearing loss by pretending they didn't exist. This doesn't stop them however utilising 'Inclusive remits' and quoting disability stats etc and non-signers as referring to them.. 10/11m with hearing loss is not, 10/11m BSL using deaf, yet, the myth is accepted as a fact, and a norm. As is the 151K BSL using deaf. They have NEVER been identified.
No charity has to validate what its statistic is, or where it is obtained, indeed, they are the sole source of them too. At the root of it all is Charities and campaigners are primarily exempt from FOI requests etc that others are bound to, so don't have to justify or validate the statistics they put out, the Charity Commission allows it too, so is equally complicit on assisting the provision of false data to the government. As a side issue it was reported online more charities than deaf people existed. Nobody questions, nobody checks, and nobody can. In the right areas, charities and campaigners have free reign to quote anything they choose to.
No comments:
Post a Comment